Mfarhanonline Social Media News: Many music fans were disappointed by Google Music Beta , the cloud-based locker that the company released at Google I/O this year — in particular because it lacks the ability to purchase music and stream seamlessly without uploading. Now it seems Google was prepared to offer big bucks to make a more robust notion. Bloomberg Businessweek is reporting that Google was ready to shell out $100 million to the four major labels — up front — for licenses. However, those negotiations fell apart because of “the music industry’s concern that search results in Google and YouTube often point to pirated music.” We already know that Google was having issues getting the labels’ blessings. The piracy angle is new, however. It was reported that Google was fed up with the labels , particularly WMG, which was said to be suggesting that Google charge users $30 per year for the cloud service. Apparently, Google wanted users to be able to try the service for free with the first 500 tracks stored. As a result, Google launched Google Music Beta without licenses with the first 20,000 stored songs on the house, meaning that users have to upload all their music to the cloud-based locker (a lengthy process) for listening across devices. This is a much less intriguing — and much bulkier — offering than what could have transpired if Google had been able to nab those licenses. The cloud-based music business has been heating up of late. Amazon launched its Cloud Player (similar to Google’s service) recently, and we’ve been hearing reports that Apple is close to unveiling its offering — possibly called iCloud — as early as Apple's developers conference in June. Apple has reportedly scored deals with three of the four major labels , which means that its service could be far superior! to Amaz on’s or Google’s. Armed with licenses, Apple's service would scan a user’s iTunes library and match those songs on its services — no uploading required. What do you think? Were the labels right to turn down Google’s overtures? Photo courtesy of Flickr, karindalziel More About: amazon , apple , cloud , Google , google music , google-music-beta , icloud , music For more Media coverage: Follow Mfarhanonline Media on Twitter Become a Fan on Facebook Subscribe to the Media channel Download our free apps for Android , Mac , iPhone and iPad Social Media reviews series maintain by Mayya
Sunday, May 29, 2011
Mfarhanonline:Google Would Have Paid More Than $100 Million to Major Labels for Licenses
Posted by
Unknown
at
9:54 AM
Fav Tag:
http://www.mfarhanonline.com/2011052926182/google-would-have-paid-more-than-100-million-to-major-labels-for-licenses/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
Popular Posts
-
Mfarhanonline Social Media News: It only takes half a second for Google to return a search based on keyw...
-
Mfarhanonline Social Media News: Name : Bamboo Bike Studio Big Idea : BBS holds bike-building workshops ...
-
Mfarhanonline News According to a statement issued by Dr Faqir Hussain, Registrar Supreme Court of Pakista...
-
GEO 436 ISLAMABAD: Opposition Leader in National Assembly, Chaudhary Nisar Ali Khan criticised the increase in salary of government employe...
-
Geo436 BOGOTA: The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights called Tuesday on Colombia to “move quickly” to identify 446 bodies unearthed in a ...
-
Plane crash: 58 bodies handed to bereaved families ISLAMABAD: At least 58 of 152 killed in the plane crash in Islamabad have been identified...
-
Mfarhanonline News Zambia was the first team through to the African Cup of Nations semifinals after a clinical 3-0...
-
Awaz Apni Report: (Maryum Razzaq) ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani said on Monday that the government was capable enough to deal...
-
Mfarhanonline Social Media News: To ease readers into The New York Times online paywall , which goes live worldwi...
-
GEO 436 QUETTA: Balochistan cabinet has approved budget proposals for fiscal year 2010-11 on Monday in a meeting chaired by Chief Minister ...
0 comments :
Post a Comment