Mfarhanonline Social Media News: Many music fans were disappointed by Google Music Beta , the cloud-based locker that the company released at Google I/O this year — in particular because it lacks the ability to purchase music and stream seamlessly without uploading. Now it seems Google was prepared to offer big bucks to make a more robust notion. Bloomberg Businessweek is reporting that Google was ready to shell out $100 million to the four major labels — up front — for licenses. However, those negotiations fell apart because of “the music industry’s concern that search results in Google and YouTube often point to pirated music.” We already know that Google was having issues getting the labels’ blessings. The piracy angle is new, however. It was reported that Google was fed up with the labels , particularly WMG, which was said to be suggesting that Google charge users $30 per year for the cloud service. Apparently, Google wanted users to be able to try the service for free with the first 500 tracks stored. As a result, Google launched Google Music Beta without licenses with the first 20,000 stored songs on the house, meaning that users have to upload all their music to the cloud-based locker (a lengthy process) for listening across devices. This is a much less intriguing — and much bulkier — offering than what could have transpired if Google had been able to nab those licenses. The cloud-based music business has been heating up of late. Amazon launched its Cloud Player (similar to Google’s service) recently, and we’ve been hearing reports that Apple is close to unveiling its offering — possibly called iCloud — as early as Apple's developers conference in June. Apple has reportedly scored deals with three of the four major labels , which means that its service could be far superior! to Amaz on’s or Google’s. Armed with licenses, Apple's service would scan a user’s iTunes library and match those songs on its services — no uploading required. What do you think? Were the labels right to turn down Google’s overtures? Photo courtesy of Flickr, karindalziel More About: amazon , apple , cloud , Google , google music , google-music-beta , icloud , music For more Media coverage: Follow Mfarhanonline Media on Twitter Become a Fan on Facebook Subscribe to the Media channel Download our free apps for Android , Mac , iPhone and iPad Social Media reviews series maintain by Mayya
Sunday, May 29, 2011
Mfarhanonline:Google Would Have Paid More Than $100 Million to Major Labels for Licenses
Posted by
Unknown
at
9:54 AM
Fav Tag:
http://www.mfarhanonline.com/2011052926182/google-would-have-paid-more-than-100-million-to-major-labels-for-licenses/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
Popular Posts
-
Mfarhanonline News Six days of tribal clashes in a remote desert town in southern Libya have killed 147 people, th...
-
Geo436 QUETTA: 26 people were killed, over 90 were injured when a suicide blast detonated at a rally held to express solidarity with the Pal...
-
Hamid Mir Shahbaz Sharif Special Program on Floods
-
Mfarhanonline Business News QUETTA: Flour prices in Balochistan witnessed an unexpected increase in the last two days...
-
Mfarhanonline Sports News SHANGHAI: Rafael Nadal came to Shanghai in high spirits and eyeing a 20th Masters title, bu...
-
Mfarhanonline Social Media News: Are you a graphic designer with a portfolio full of impressive, high-quality wor...
-
GEO 436 WASHINGTON: A top aide to US President Barack Obama predicted a smoother relationship with Japan after Naoto Kan takes over as prim...
-
We provide SEO , PPC, Facebook Marketing and web development services . Every business requires web maintenance and on online promotion. ...
-
GEO 436 JERUSALEM: Israel said on Monday it would investigate a deadly raid on a Gaza aid flotilla on its own, after rejecting a UN proposa...
0 comments :
Post a Comment