Mfarhanonline Social Media News: Many music fans were disappointed by Google Music Beta , the cloud-based locker that the company released at Google I/O this year — in particular because it lacks the ability to purchase music and stream seamlessly without uploading. Now it seems Google was prepared to offer big bucks to make a more robust notion. Bloomberg Businessweek is reporting that Google was ready to shell out $100 million to the four major labels — up front — for licenses. However, those negotiations fell apart because of “the music industry’s concern that search results in Google and YouTube often point to pirated music.” We already know that Google was having issues getting the labels’ blessings. The piracy angle is new, however. It was reported that Google was fed up with the labels , particularly WMG, which was said to be suggesting that Google charge users $30 per year for the cloud service. Apparently, Google wanted users to be able to try the service for free with the first 500 tracks stored. As a result, Google launched Google Music Beta without licenses with the first 20,000 stored songs on the house, meaning that users have to upload all their music to the cloud-based locker (a lengthy process) for listening across devices. This is a much less intriguing — and much bulkier — offering than what could have transpired if Google had been able to nab those licenses. The cloud-based music business has been heating up of late. Amazon launched its Cloud Player (similar to Google’s service) recently, and we’ve been hearing reports that Apple is close to unveiling its offering — possibly called iCloud — as early as Apple's developers conference in June. Apple has reportedly scored deals with three of the four major labels , which means that its service could be far superior! to Amaz on’s or Google’s. Armed with licenses, Apple's service would scan a user’s iTunes library and match those songs on its services — no uploading required. What do you think? Were the labels right to turn down Google’s overtures? Photo courtesy of Flickr, karindalziel More About: amazon , apple , cloud , Google , google music , google-music-beta , icloud , music For more Media coverage: Follow Mfarhanonline Media on Twitter Become a Fan on Facebook Subscribe to the Media channel Download our free apps for Android , Mac , iPhone and iPad Social Media reviews series maintain by Mayya
Sunday, May 29, 2011
Mfarhanonline:Google Would Have Paid More Than $100 Million to Major Labels for Licenses
Posted by
Unknown
at
9:54 AM
Fav Tag:
http://www.mfarhanonline.com/2011052926182/google-would-have-paid-more-than-100-million-to-major-labels-for-licenses/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
Popular Posts
-
GEO 436 ISLAMABAD: Foreign Minister Makhdoom Shah Mahmood Qureshi on Monday said that Pakistan wanted to assist Afghanistan in capacity bui...
-
GEO 436 NEW YORK: The world faces the nightmare possibility of fishless oceans by 2050 unless fishing fleets are slashed and stocks allowed...
-
Mfarhanonline Social Media News: Behringer Soundscape Dock While this may look like your standard iPhone/iPod doc...
-
Geo 436 KARACHI: The prices of vegetables in vegetable market go down due to tension prevailed in Karachi. Talking to Geo News, Deputy Secre...
-
Mfarhanonline Social Media News: Online document hosting service Scribd launched an iPhone app Tuesday that aims ...
-
Geo436 Staff Report ISLAMABAD: Federal Information Minister Qamar Zaman Kaira said on Thursday National Oversight Disaster Management Counci...
-
GEO 436 WASHINGTON: US President Barack Obama will establish an independent presidential commission to probe the huge oil spill from a wrec...
-
Mfarhanonline Social Media News: When Yoav Medan's mother Judith passed away in June, the Israel-based medica...
-
Mfarhanonline Sports News LONDON: England captain Alastair Cook won the toss and elected to bat against Sri Lanka in ...
0 comments :
Post a Comment